Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Donald Sutton's avatar

As always, Hugo, a well-written, kind, and challenging thought piece. However, this time I think you've missed one crucial item: the difference between attraction and preference.

Melinda Li did not change her attraction, she changed her preferences. Unless I missed something critical in your article, I believe that trying to equate the two is futile at best, damaging at worst.

I fully accept that attraction generally doesn't change, and that it is one of the more immutable characteristics of a person. I'm attracted to women. That's it. I've never sought to change that, though I've tried to imagine being gay, and it is beyond what I can envision.

Preference can, and probably should, change over time. 31 years ago, I was strongly attracted to hot, skinny, blonde women with curly hair. Today I'm attracted to hot, not so skinny, not so blonde middle-aged women with straight hair. Specifically, I'm attracted to women who are my wife. (It's our 31st anniversary today!)

Treating attraction as though it were preference is the root of conversion therapy. And likely the biggest reason it is largely unsucessful.

Exploring the line between attraction and preference is probably a series of articles in and of itself. One thought experiment that I've been attempting to explore is with trans identity. If my wife discovered she felt more true being a man, would I still be attracted to her? How far along the transition process would she get before in my brain I made the switch from woman (attracted) to man (not attracted). If she became a man but kept the female parts, would I still be attracted? If she fully transitioned, would I still be attracted, and hence change from heterosexual to homosexual? Or maybe bi?

As you can see, I have lots of thoughts about the difference between the ideas of attraction and preference.

Expand full comment

No posts